You’ve seen them at awards ceremonies. You’ve looked on in either disgust or admiration -dependent upon your knowledge – as the movie stars and music stars and T.V. stars step forward to accept their Oscars or Grammys or Brits or BAFTA’s. You will have listened as they then arrogantly trumpet their thanks to their god and, of course, Jesus for giving them their success.

Yet these celebrities stand adorned in clothing worth tens of thousands of pounds. They display gaudy jewelry worth hundreds of thousands of dollars. They wear shoes that cost more than many cars. The items that they sport on awards nights are worth enough as would feed a Third World village for a year… or much longer.

They do all this, yet they see no contradiction in their invocation of the name of a humble carpenter who criticized those who would live for material gain. Many critics over the years have quoted these words of Jesus as regards the materialistic,

‘Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God’.

The meaning seems fairly clear. Yet a multitude of Capitalists, who yet claim to be Christian, will be found clambering aggressively in their pathetic attempts at spinning these words of the humble Nazarene into something which they are not. I have read and heard their desperate excuses, and loathe the feeble reasons given to justify their conduct. 

I feel that hypocrisy oozes from the pores of those who bequeath Jesus with thanks for making them so excessively wealthy, whilst in parts of the world children starve to death or die from treatable diseases.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not suggesting that successful people need feel guilt for their achievements, so long as those achievements were not gained at the expense of good people. Not should the well-heeled be obliged to give away all their riches and live in poverty, as did Prince Siddhartha.

However, what they should not do is squander their wealth on trinkets and baubles, nor on garments and garnish, when that wealth could instead be used to save lives. Yes, they can live without guilt in luxury, but must they live in decadence?

For those morally corrupt imbeciles, who use microphones in their acts of ethical ineptitude, to then flaunt such opulence in the most public of arenas whilst intimating that a deity and a poor tradesman have somehow deigned to assist them in their acquisition of great wealth, is obscene. Such behaviour speaks volumes about those who engage in the practice.

Perhaps it is time that the rest of us pay greater attention to the moral conduct of the trendsetters and role-models who generously grace us with their greatness. For we are the ones who make them who they are. It is us who pay to see their movies. It is us who go to their concerts, and buy their songs and merchandise. It is our money that is being displayed so callously on the red carpet as they primp and preen and delude themselves into thinking that they are something other than us.

We made them and we make them. Without us, they are just regular people with lighter pockets, desperate desires and ruthless ambition.

So let the greedy and the selfish, the callous and the inconsiderate, be who they are, and let us see them in that light. But for god’s sake, let’s not stay quiet as such cretins wax lyrical about a kindly, Jewish manual worker purportedly helping them to become uber-rich and famous, when we all know that such a person would be thoroughly disgusted with any association to a lifestyle that helps perpetuate ever more greed and imbalance, in an already ill-divided world.

8 Comments »

  1. Given the popularity of the prosperity gospel, these celebrities appear to have it all, faith in God, his endless blessings poured out upon the materially, and success and recognition in their given line of work. So it’s not necessarily hypocrisy.
    We have televangelists who live very much like the celebrities do as they are celebrities in their own sphere – they buy private airplanes to jet around the world and share the prosperity gospel message, and live just as extravagantly (if not moreso.)
    We have to correct our theology first, replace prosperity gospel with authentic teaching – and that might induce more humility among our more recognizable brothers and sisters in the faith.

    Like

    • Prosperity theology is not Christian, regardless of who claims otherwise. It is a perfect example of what the article stated, namely that mealy-mouthed excuses are being offered in defence of those who are greedy and selfish, yet wish to be known as ‘Christian’. Therefore, the point regarding hypocrisy stands.

      Like

      • Tell that to the poor souls who pay tithes beyond their means in an attempt to sow a seed that will reap a mighty harvest; the ones who give until it hurts and keep on giving – at some level, there are true believers outshining the wealthy televangelists they are funding. It’s watching the celebrities – the rags to riches stories they represent – that gives them some hope that in some small way, they too will prosper in God’s kingdom; and isn’t that the promise of eternal life?

        Like

      • You do realize that you’re conversing with an atheist? Perhaps you have not read the piece properly. This is not a theological discussion. Nor will it be. It is about the clear hypocrisy of those who invoke the name of Jesus, yet revel in debauched wealth, which is in clear contradiction of his words. You appear to be getting lost on this point, and your words therefore make little sense. I hope you are not flagellating, as you are reading this…

        Like

  2. All I’m saying is that it depends on how you look at it. Those who adhere to prosperity gospel teachings see it as a confirmation of what they were told that the Bible says; regardless of what you do or don’t believe.

    Like

    • … and those who adhere to racist beliefs are only following what they have been led to believe, whether in Mein Kampf or any other literature of hate . That does not make it justified. Decadent celebs who espouse an adherence to the teachings of Jesus, are delusional hypocrites.

      Like

      • So it’s impossible for even one among them to be a true believer who’s just extremely blessed? Like Job was before / after he was challenged to prove his faith? Or would Job have been just as hypocritical for being wealthy and extremely devout?

        Like

  3. ‘True believer’? ‘Extremely blessed’? You have given yourself away. You are searching for excuses to justify decadent behaviour. According to you, to be rich is to be extremely blessed. You are clearly a delusional fool. As I said, this is not a theological discussion. It is, however, one of morals and ethics, of which yours appear to be either poor or non-existent. I couldn’t give a shit about Job, but I do care about jobs, which are either invisible or poorly paid, and that is because of money-worshipping clowns such as you. Note: Job was a tit who hoarded his wealth rather than sharing it. His head was up his ass, and if he got you, he would go up your ass, which is ok, as I’m not homophobic, but I wonder if a bible-thumper such as yourself can say the same thing?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s