The events that surrounded the destruction of the Twin Towers on the 11th September, 2001, have been dissected relentlessly. There are those who accept the official line on the reasons for the attacks and the way in which they were carried out. There are an increasing number of others who don’t. These dissidents include many professionals from the construction sector who claim that the fall of the Towers and WTC 5 was due to controlled demolition.
Rebel Voice has not researched this topic in any depth, but has read a number of reports on it, as well as the attack on the Pentagon on the same day. The conclusion reached here is that there are many outstanding issues that have still to be addressed, and the official determinations are not to be believed in their entirety.
The greatest defence that any corrupt government has is the term ‘Conspiracy Theory’. With these two words, citizens are turned away from any investigation or hypothesis regarding major events. False flag incidents, of which there have always been many around the world, are labelled as conspiracy theories. Normally curious people can thus become conditioned to accepting the official position. That in itself is a problem.
Not every proffered scenario regarding what took place on 9/11 is either feasible or worth the time it takes to look into it. But some are. The ridiculous ones may be created by the very people who have something to hide. They fabricate theories by the bucket-load so that the truth becomes lost in the chatter. It’s an age-old tactic and expertly employed today.
The following article presents us with one possibility as to why the Towers were brought down on that fateful day with the resultant loss of 2996 lives. It may not be complete. It may not even be accurate. But it is worth reading if only to open the mind to the possibilities. The old adage when investigating a crime is to follow the money. Perhaps this also applies to 9/11?